Do `build_assets_job()` and `define_assets_job()` ...
# dagster-feedback
b
Do
build_assets_job()
and
define_assets_job()
have same responsibilities ? Bringing it up because I have been using
define_assets_job
to add to Definitions until today, but I also discovered
build_assets_job
and many more new
build_*
functions that appear more intuitive by following the Builder design pattern.
s
build_assets_job
is an internal utility that isn't designed for public consumption, so I'd say use it at your own risk
b
Does this apply for all
build_*
functions?