James O'Toole
02/08/2024, 9:16 PMbuild_sensor_context
in a test, how do i use it along with a mock DagsterRun
instance?Scout
02/08/2024, 9:16 PMbuild_sensor_context
in a test, you can create a mock DagsterRun
instance and pass it to the context builder function to simulate a run context for your sensor. However, the documentation does not provide a direct example of using build_sensor_context
with a mock DagsterRun
instance. Instead, it provides guidance on how to build a sensor execution context using the provided parameters, which can be used to invoke a sensor definition. Here's a general approach based on the documentation: 1. Create an ephemeral Dagster instance using DagsterInstance.ephemeral()
. 2. Execute a job or an operation to generate a DagsterRun
object. 3. Use the DagsterRun
object to build the sensor context. Here is a code snippet from the documentation that demonstrates how to build the context for a run status sensor, which you can adapt for your use case with a mock `DagsterRun`: python from dagster import DagsterInstance, build_run_status_sensor_context # Create an ephemeral Dagster instance instance = DagsterInstance.ephemeral() # Execute a job to generate a DagsterRun object (this is where you would use your mock instead) result = my_job.execute_in_process(instance=instance) dagster_run = result.dagster_run # Create the sensor context sensor_context = build_run_status_sensor_context( sensor_name="my_sensor", dagster_instance=instance, dagster_run=dagster_run, dagster_event=result.get_job_success_event(), # or get_job_failure_event() ) # Now you can invoke your sensor with the created context my_sensor(sensor_context)
In this example, my_job
would be a job that you expect to succeed and generate a DagsterRun
object. If you want to use a mock DagsterRun
, you would replace the execution of my_job
with the creation of a mock DagsterRun
object that suits your testing needs. Remember that the build_sensor_context
function is used to build a context for sensor invocation, and it can accept parameters such as instance
, cursor
, repository_name
, repository_def
, resources
, and definitions
. If you need to mock the DagsterRun
for an asset sensor, you would need to provide an instance parameter when building your context, as asset sensors rely on querying for new events from the DagsterInstance
. Please adapt the above example to fit your specific testing scenario, and if you need to mock specific behaviors or attributes of the DagsterRun
, you can do so using standard Python mocking libraries like unittest.mock
.James O'Toole
02/09/2024, 3:28 PMself.run_id = "abc123"
self.tags = {
"job_completion_callback_url": "<https://www.foo.com>",
"job_completion_callback_auth": "auth_token"
}
self.mock_dagster_instance = DagsterInstance.ephemeral()
self.job_name = "some_job"
self.mock_dagster_run = DagsterRun(run_id=self.run_id, tags=self.tags, job_name=self.job_name)
result = self.job_name.execute_in_process(instance=self.mock_dagster_instance)
dagster_run = result.mock_dagster_run
# Create the sensor context
self.sensor_context = build_run_status_sensor_context(
sensor_name="my_sensor",
dagster_instance=self.mock_dagster_instance,
dagster_run=dagster_run,
dagster_event=result.get_job_success_event(), # or get_job_failure_event()
)
could you help me fix the following error i get when running my test suite?
AttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'execute_in_process'
Scout
02/09/2024, 3:28 PMAttributeError: 'str' object has no attribute 'execute_in_process'
, is occurring because self.job_name
is a string and not a job object. The execute_in_process
method is a method of a job object, not a string. To fix this error, you need to ensure that self.job_name
is assigned to an actual job object that you've defined using the @job
decorator. Here's an example of how you might define a job: python from dagster import job, op @op def my_op(): # Your operation logic here pass @job def some_job(): my_op()
Once you have defined your job, you can reference it when setting `self.job_name`: python self.job_name = some_job
Now, when you call execute_in_process
on self.job_name
, it will be calling the method on the job object, not a string: python result = self.job_name.execute_in_process(instance=self.mock_dagster_instance)
Make sure to replace some_job
with the actual job object you have defined in your code. Here's how your test setup should look after the correction: python from dagster import DagsterInstance, build_run_status_sensor_context, DagsterRun # Assuming some_job is a job object you have defined elsewhere in your code self.run_id = "abc123" self.tags = { "job_completion_callback_url": "<https://www.foo.com>", "job_completion_callback_auth": "auth_token" } self.mock_dagster_instance = DagsterInstance.ephemeral() self.job_name = some_job # Replace with your actual job object self.mock_dagster_run = DagsterRun(run_id=self.run_id, tags=self.tags, job_name=self.job_name.name) result = self.job_name.execute_in_process(instance=self.mock_dagster_instance) dagster_run = result.dagster_run # Use the result's dagster_run, not mock_dagster_run # Create the sensor context self.sensor_context = build_run_status_sensor_context( sensor_name="my_sensor", dagster_instance=self.mock_dagster_instance, dagster_run=dagster_run, dagster_event=result.get_job_success_event(), # or get_job_failure_event() )
Make sure that some_job
is the job you want to test, and replace my_sensor
with the actual sensor name you are testing. This should resolve the AttributeError
you're encountering.James O'Toole
02/09/2024, 3:31 PMall_assets = load_assets_from_modules([assets], group_name=GROUP_NAME)
materialize_all_assets_job = define_asset_job(
name="some_job",
selection=AssetSelection.all(),
# auto-terminate run after 20 minutes; we can toggle this up or down as needed
tags={MAX_RUNTIME_SECONDS_TAG: 1200},
)
defs = Definitions(
assets=all_assets,
jobs=[materialize_all_assets_job],
sensors=[success_callback, failure_callback]
)
how should i therefore fix my test setup?Scout
02/09/2024, 3:31 PMdefine_asset_job
to create your job, you'll need to resolve the job from the Definitions
object before you can execute it in process. The define_asset_job
function returns an UnresolvedAssetJobDefinition
, which needs to be resolved with the actual asset definitions before it can be executed. Here's how you can adjust your test setup: 1. Use the Definitions
object to get the resolved job definition. 2. Execute the resolved job in process. 3. Use the result of the execution to create the sensor context. Here's an example of how you might adjust your test setup: python from dagster import DagsterInstance, build_run_status_sensor_context, DagsterRun, Definitions, define_asset_job, AssetSelection # Define your assets and job as you have in your actual code all_assets = load_assets_from_modules([assets], group_name=GROUP_NAME) materialize_all_assets_job = define_asset_job( name="some_job", selection=AssetSelection.all(), tags={MAX_RUNTIME_SECONDS_TAG: 1200}, ) # Create a Definitions object with your assets and job defs = Definitions( assets=all_assets, jobs=[materialize_all_assets_job], sensors=[success_callback, failure_callback] ) # Resolve the job from the Definitions object resolved_job = defs.get_job_def("some_job") # Create an ephemeral Dagster instance mock_dagster_instance = DagsterInstance.ephemeral() # Execute the resolved job in process result = resolved_job.execute_in_process(instance=mock_dagster_instance) dagster_run = result.dagster_run # Create the sensor context sensor_context = build_run_status_sensor_context( sensor_name="my_sensor", dagster_instance=mock_dagster_instance, dagster_run=dagster_run, dagster_event=result.get_job_success_event(), # or get_job_failure_event() )
In this setup, resolved_job
is the job definition that you can execute in process. The execute_in_process
method will return a result object that contains the dagster_run
and the events that you can use to create the sensor context. Make sure to replace success_callback
, failure_callback
, assets
, and GROUP_NAME
with the actual values from your code. This should allow you to execute your job in the test and create the sensor context without encountering the AttributeError
.James O'Toole
02/09/2024, 3:43 PM