I wish we could have more flexible asset checks. C...
# feature-asset-checks
g
I wish we could have more flexible asset checks. Currently each check is mapped to an asset. In my use case, I have hundreds of assets(each one representing a table in a DB), and I would like to also add different checks for different assets. In future, if another person add an asset (another table in a DB), he could reuse some of the checks defined already. Is there any way around this? Slack Conversation
🙏 1
g
for python based checks you can simply use a factory
b
This is what we’ve started doing in PUDL.