SUBHADEEP ROY
03/09/2024, 11:22 AMScout
03/09/2024, 11:22 AMresource_defs
to provide resources to your assets. However, ensure that the resources you are providing match the expected resource keys within your assets. 3. Job Definition: When defining a job that orchestrates multiple assets, you should pass the assets as a list to the job definition. The job will then construct a graph of these assets, respecting their dependencies. 4. Repository Definition: Your repository definition should return a list of all the assets and jobs that you want to be part of the repository. 5. Execution: To execute a job, you can use the execute_in_process
method, which is suitable for testing and development purposes. Looking at your code, there are a few potential issues and improvements that can be made: - The dwh_metadata_creation
asset seems to depend on the outputs of other assets. You should pass these assets as inputs to dwh_metadata_creation
by including them in the function parameters. However, your current syntax for defining the dependencies in dwh_metadata_creation
is incorrect. You should not call the assets as functions within the body of another asset. Instead, pass them as parameters. - The all_assets_job
job definition is calling the assets as functions, which is not necessary. Instead, you should pass the assets directly to the job definition. - The crawler_asset_job
function is trying to execute the job from the repository by calling get_job
. However, the correct method to retrieve a job from a repository is my_repo.get_all_jobs()
which returns a dictionary of jobs, and you can access the desired job by its name. Here is a revised example based on the documentation: python @asset def asset_one(context): # Your logic here pass @asset def asset_two(context, asset_one_output): # Your logic here, using asset_one_output pass @job def my_job(): asset_two(asset_one()) @repository def my_repo(): return [my_job]
In this example, asset_two
depends on the output of asset_one
, and this dependency is expressed by passing asset_one
as an input to asset_two
within the job definition. Please review your code and adjust the asset definitions and job orchestration to correctly express dependencies and resource definitions. If you encounter specific errors or issues, you may need to consult the documentation or seek further assistance with debugging.SUBHADEEP ROY
03/09/2024, 11:28 AMpython
@asset
def asset_one(context):
# Your logic here
pass
@asset
def asset_two(context, asset_one_output):
# Your logic here, using asset_one_output
pass
@asset
def asset_three(context, asset_one_output,asset_two_output):
# Your logic here, using asset_one_output
pass
@job
def my_job():
asset_two(asset_one())
@repository
def my_repo():
return [my_job]
here i have a 3rd asset which depends on two asset output how to define it?Scout
03/09/2024, 11:28 AMasset_three
which depends on the outputs of both asset_one
and `asset_two`: python @asset def asset_one(context): # Your logic here pass @asset def asset_two(context, asset_one_output): # Your logic here, using asset_one_output pass @asset def asset_three(context, asset_one_output, asset_two_output): # Your logic here, using asset_one_output and asset_two_output pass @job def my_job(): asset_three(asset_one(), asset_two(asset_one())) @repository def my_repo(): return [my_job]
In the my_job
definition, asset_two
is called with asset_one()
as its input, and asset_three
is called with both asset_one()
and asset_two(asset_one())
as its inputs. This way, Dagster knows to execute asset_one
and asset_two
before asset_three
, and it passes their outputs to asset_three
as arguments. When you define a job in this way, Dagster constructs a graph of assets, respecting their dependencies based on the parameters you've provided. The execution plan for the job will ensure that assets are executed in the correct order, with the outputs of upstream assets being passed to downstream assets that depend on them.SUBHADEEP ROY
03/12/2024, 8:32 AMScout
03/12/2024, 8:34 AMschema_list_for_query
to all assets in a job, you can use the config
system in Dagster to supply runtime configuration to your assets. Each asset can be configured to accept a schema_list_for_query
parameter, and you can then provide the value for this parameter when you launch the job. Here's an example of how you can modify your assets to accept a schema_list_for_query
parameter and how to provide that parameter when launching the job: 1. Modify each asset to accept a config schema: python from dagster import asset, Field, String @asset(config_schema={"schema_list_for_query": Field(String)}) def my_asset(context): schema_list_for_query = context.op_config["schema_list_for_query"] # Use schema_list_for_query in your asset logic pass # Repeat for other assets as needed
2. Define your job as usual: python @job def my_asset_job(): my_asset() # And other assets as needed
3. When you launch the job, provide the schema_list_for_query
parameter in the config: python result = my_asset_job.execute_in_process( run_config={ "ops": { "my_asset": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": "your_schema_list_value" } }, # Repeat for other assets as needed } } )
In this example, my_asset
is an asset that now accepts a config schema with a field named schema_list_for_query
. When you execute the job, you provide the value for schema_list_for_query
in the run_config
dictionary under the corresponding asset's config. Please note that the execute_in_process
method is typically used for testing and development. For production scenarios, you would provide the config when you launch the job through the Dagster UI or when you trigger the job via the Dagster API. If you have many assets and you want to avoid repeating the config for each asset, you can consider using a shared resource that provides the schema_list_for_query
to all assets that require it. This way, you can centralize the configuration and make it easier to manage.SUBHADEEP ROY
03/12/2024, 8:49 AMschema_list_for_query
for a particular asset so the config also should be for that particular asset or shall i add for allScout
03/12/2024, 8:49 AMschema_list_for_query
to be specific to a particular asset, you should define the config schema only for that asset. You do not need to add the config schema to all assets if they do not require it. Here's how you can define the config schema for a single asset: python from dagster import asset, Field, String @asset(config_schema={"schema_list_for_query": Field(String)}) def my_specific_asset(context): schema_list_for_query = context.op_config["schema_list_for_query"] # Use schema_list_for_query in your asset logic pass # Other assets without the config_schema @asset def my_other_asset(context): # Asset logic that does not require schema_list_for_query pass # Repeat for other assets as needed
And when you launch the job, you only provide the schema_list_for_query
parameter in the config for the asset that requires it: python result = my_asset_job.execute_in_process( run_config={ "ops": { "my_specific_asset": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": "your_schema_list_value" } }, # No need to provide config for other assets that don't require it } } )
In this example, only my_specific_asset
has a config_schema
that includes schema_list_for_query
. When you execute the job, you provide the value for schema_list_for_query
only for my_specific_asset
. Other assets that do not require this configuration are not affected and do not need to have a config_schema
defined for schema_list_for_query
.SUBHADEEP ROY
03/12/2024, 8:56 AMScout
03/12/2024, 8:56 AMschema_list_for_query
is a list of strings, you can use the List
field type from Dagster's typing
module. Here's how you can define the config schema for an asset that accepts a list of strings: python from dagster import asset, Field from typing import List @asset(config_schema={"schema_list_for_query": Field(List[str])}) def my_specific_asset(context): schema_list_for_query = context.op_config["schema_list_for_query"] # Use schema_list_for_query in your asset logic pass # Other assets without the config_schema @asset def my_other_asset(context): # Asset logic that does not require schema_list_for_query pass # Repeat for other assets as needed
When you launch the job, you provide the schema_list_for_query
parameter as a list of strings in the config for the asset that requires it: python result = my_asset_job.execute_in_process( run_config={ "ops": { "my_specific_asset": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["schema1", "schema2", "schema3"] } }, # No need to provide config for other assets that don't require it } } )
In this example, schema_list_for_query
is expected to be a list of strings, and you provide an actual list of strings when you execute the job. This configuration is specific to my_specific_asset
, and other assets do not require this configuration.SUBHADEEP ROY
03/12/2024, 9:25 AMScout
03/12/2024, 9:25 AMtyping.List
type directly. Instead, you should use Dagster's own Array
type for lists. Here's how you can define the config schema for an asset that accepts a list of strings using Dagster's Array
type: python from dagster import asset, Field, Array, String @asset(config_schema={"schema_list_for_query": Field(Array[String])}) def my_specific_asset(context): schema_list_for_query = context.op_config["schema_list_for_query"] # Use schema_list_for_query in your asset logic pass # Other assets without the config_schema @asset def my_other_asset(context): # Asset logic that does not require schema_list_for_query pass # Repeat for other assets as needed
When you launch the job, you provide the schema_list_for_query
parameter as a list of strings in the config for the asset that requires it: python result = my_asset_job.execute_in_process( run_config={ "ops": { "my_specific_asset": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["schema1", "schema2", "schema3"] } }, # No need to provide config for other assets that don't require it } } )
In this revised example, Field(Array[String])
is used to define a list of strings in the config schema, which is compatible with Dagster's config system. This should resolve the error you're encountering.SUBHADEEP ROY
03/12/2024, 9:50 AMScout
03/12/2024, 9:50 AMString[...]
) with a type that doesn't support it. This is likely due to the fact that the String
type from Dagster's type system is not meant to be used with subscript notation. In Dagster, to define a list of strings in the config schema, you should use Array
with str
as the inner type, not String
. Here's the correct way to define the config schema for an asset that accepts a list of strings: python from dagster import asset, Field, Array @asset(config_schema={"schema_list_for_query": Field(Array(str))}) def my_specific_asset(context): schema_list_for_query = context.op_config["schema_list_for_query"] # Use schema_list_for_query in your asset logic pass # Other assets without the config_schema @asset def my_other_asset(context): # Asset logic that does not require schema_list_for_query pass # Repeat for other assets as needed
When you launch the job, you provide the schema_list_for_query
parameter as a list of strings in the config for the asset that requires it: python result = my_asset_job.execute_in_process( run_config={ "ops": { "my_specific_asset": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["schema1", "schema2", "schema3"] } }, # No need to provide config for other assets that don't require it } } )
In this corrected example, Field(Array(str))
is used to define a list of strings in the config schema. This should resolve the "TypeError: 'type' object is not subscriptable" error you're encountering.SUBHADEEP ROY
03/12/2024, 10:07 AMScout
03/12/2024, 10:07 AMshow_col_asset_2
, show_col_asset_3
, show_col_asset_4
, and show_col_asset_5
. It seems that these assets are expecting a config entry named schema_list_for_query
, which has not been provided. 2. The value provided for schema_list_for_query
for show_col_asset
is not a list, as expected by the config schema. To resolve these issues, you need to ensure that: - Each asset that requires the schema_list_for_query
config entry has it provided in the run_config
. - The value for schema_list_for_query
is indeed a list of strings. Here's how you can structure your run_config
to provide the necessary config entries for each asset: python result = my_asset_job.execute_in_process( run_config={ "ops": { "show_col_asset": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["schema1", "schema2", "schema3"] } }, "show_col_asset_2": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["schema1", "schema2", "schema3"] } }, "show_col_asset_3": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["schema1", "schema2", "schema3"] } }, "show_col_asset_4": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["schema1", "schema2", "schema3"] } }, "show_col_asset_5": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["schema1", "schema2", "schema3"] } }, # Repeat for other assets as needed } } )
Make sure that each asset that requires the schema_list_for_query
config has an entry under ops
in the run_config
, and that the value for schema_list_for_query
is a list. If you have many assets that require the same config, and you want to avoid repeating the config for each asset, you might consider using a shared resource or leveraging Dagster's configured
API to create a new version of the asset with the config baked in. However, this approach would depend on the specifics of your use case and how you've structured your Dagster assets and resources.SUBHADEEP ROY
03/12/2024, 10:12 AMScout
03/12/2024, 10:12 AMschema_list_for_query
is expected to be a list with a single string element like 'staging'
, you should provide it as a list with one item in your run_config
. Here's how you can refactor the run_config
to include the schema_list_for_query
with the value `('staging',)`: python result = my_asset_job.execute_in_process( run_config={ "ops": { "show_col_asset": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["staging"] } }, "show_col_asset_2": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["staging"] } }, "show_col_asset_3": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["staging"] } }, "show_col_asset_4": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["staging"] } }, "show_col_asset_5": { "config": { "schema_list_for_query": ["staging"] } }, # Repeat for other assets as needed } } )
In this configuration, schema_list_for_query
is provided as a list with a single string element ["staging"]
for each asset that requires it. This should match the expected config schema for the assets and resolve the error you're encountering.