The cloud-native orchestrator for the whole development lifecycle, with integrated lineage and observability.

dagster

I guess i'm missing something  - How do I define a `dict` type within a solid configuration?
I'm not able to understand how to define a general dict from the error :
Passing `Dict` sets an error
&gt;  DagsterInvalidDefintionError: Attempted to pass &lt;dagster.core.types.python_dict.DagsterDictApi object&gt; to a Field that expects a valid dagster type usable in config (e.g. Dict, Int,  String et al).
The `Permissive` is too strict - I just need a general `dict` type
Tried
&gt; Shape({})      
&gt; &gt; but still problematic
```1. A Python primitive type that resolve to dagster config
   types: int, float, bool, str.

2. A dagster config type: Int, Float, Bool, String, StringSource, Path, Any,
   Array, Noneable, Selector, Shape, Permissive, etc.

3. A bare python dictionary, which is wrapped in Shape. Any
   values in the dictionary get resolved by the same rules, recursively.

4. A bare python list of length one which itself is config type.
   Becomes Array with list element as an argument.```

Permissive allows one to pass in any dictionary

OK,  When I gave `Permissive` I got an error, then I gave a `Permissive({key:val})` - too strict . finally I just need to `Permissive()`  which worked - sorry for the hassle.