I guess i'm missing something - How do I define a

dict

type within a solid configuration? I'm not able to understand how to define a general dict from the error : Passing

Dict

sets an error

DagsterInvalidDefintionError: Attempted to pass <dagster.core.types.python_dict.DagsterDictApi object> to a Field that expects a valid dagster type usable in config (e.g. Dict, Int, String et al).

The

Permissive

is too strict - I just need a general

dict

type Tried

Shape({})

> but still problematic

1. A Python primitive type that resolve to dagster config
   types: int, float, bool, str.

2. A dagster config type: Int, Float, Bool, String, StringSource, Path, Any,
   Array, Noneable, Selector, Shape, Permissive, etc.

3. A bare python dictionary, which is wrapped in Shape. Any
   values in the dictionary get resolved by the same rules, recursively.

4. A bare python list of length one which itself is config type.
   Becomes Array with list element as an argument.

"The Permissive is too strict'

OK, When I gave

Permissive

I got an error, then I gave a

Permissive({key:val})

- too strict . finally I just need to

Permissive()

which worked - sorry for the hassle.