general question: is there any appetite/future plans to be able to have solids defined within .ipynb files? so one .ipynb could contain multiple solids rather than the entire notebook being defined as a single solid?

Hey Kevin. I think this is really tricky and would also require substantial changes to papermill, the library that powers dagstermill

Hi Nick, I would be very interested in having a clear dependency graph within the notebook that could then be displayed in dagster when executed as a pipeline. But I do think my ideal would be to have multiple solids within a notebook such that I could have the following (attached). And this would be represented within dagster as being separate solids when executed -- if you can think of a way that would approximate this without defining them as solids I am all ears!